Reviews for JVC Everio GZ-MC500 Digital Camcorder - 1.8" LCD - CCD10x Optical Zoom - 200x Digital Zoom - 4 GB Microdrive Included - MPN: GZMC500
By member:
sooryanp
- May 23, 2005
JVC Everio GZ-MC500 Digital Camcorder - 1.8" LCD -...Strengths: Quality of Picture Small Size Navigation Weakness: No Remote No Cover for LCD Hi 67% of readers found this review helpful. Did you find it helpful or unhelpful? Top
Reply by member: cuttyshark
Jun 14, 2005 I bought this camera last month. The picture quality is very BAD! 5 Mpixels? Where?? My SONY dsc-s85, 4.1 MP has much better photo quality than this supposed JVC 5 MP. The video quality is good.
Reply by member: piygu6rdtrs
Jun 14, 2005 Where is the other review of this camera??!!
Reply by member: dgreene
Jun 27, 2005 Has anybody found a way to create a widescreen DVD with this camera? I found that the camera will generate a move with a 16:9 aspect ratio, but that the included Cyberlink PowerDirector software reduces the video to 4:3. I cannot find anywhere that the Cyberlink editing software supports 16:9. I also tried Pinnacle Studio 9, and Sony Vegas Studio. Neither of these packages can correctly open the video files. The Sony software will open the mpeg, but won't provide any sound. I called JVC, and was told that I need to call Cyberlink regarding the lack of 16:9 support. When I questioned them about problems opening the files from this camera with other editing packages, I was told that they only support the Cyberlink software included with the camera.
Reply by member: kranthipbl
Jun 29, 2005 hi have u tried playing in tv after making movie ?
Reply by member: dgreene
Jun 29, 2005 I can only play the movie with a widescreen aspect ratio using the PowerDVD application. If I connect the camera directly to the tv, the image is played in 4:3, and everything is distorted (skinny). Also, the Cyberlink software used to create a dvd squishes the video into a 4:3 format and again everthing is distorted. This is true even if I try to play the finished DVD using the PowerDVD application.
Reply by member: kranthipbl
Jun 29, 2005 which format u r making movie?
Reply by member: dgreene
Jun 29, 2005 If I copy the .mod file, rename it to .mpg and play it using PowerDVD, the movie will play in a 16:9 format. If I try to open the file in Windows media player the image is 4:3. The pixel counts for the video do not change when I open it in PowerDirector, although I notice that the file size property of the input file in PowerDirector is slightly smaller than the actual file size in windows explorer.
Reply by member: robertlbyrd
Jun 29, 2005 So am I to unbderstand that this camera uses a proprietary file format that cannot be manipulated with any software but the included application? I was hoping I could just drag the files off of it like an external hard drive and edit them with my standard video editing software of which I use a few different packages.
Reply by member: dgreene
Jun 29, 2005 I don't know if the files from this camera are proprietary or not, but so far they are not properly read into Pinnacle Studio 9, or the Sony Vegas with DVD suite. When I called JVC regarding this problem, I was told that I needed the proper codec for the packages to work. When I asked how to get the proper codec, I was told by the JVC support person that she did't know how.
Reply by member: robertlbyrd
Jun 29, 2005 I just found this info from a review which supports the previous comment, but offers no real solutions:
Reply by member: dgreene
Jun 29, 2005 Where can I go to find the proper codecs? I tried re-naming files and opening them, but only the Sony software would play the file. The Sony software also wouldn't recognize the sound. Is there any software packages you could recommend? I like this camera, and would like to use it. Also, unlike the previous Everio models the GZ-500 supposedly records in a true 16:9 format. Is there any recommendations you can make for software that will recognize and burn this widescreen format?
Reply by member: robertlbyrd
Jun 29, 2005 Not sure, I guess i will buy one and try it out.
Reply by member: Rank_Amecha
Jul 1, 2005 I think anybody that has gone to the trouble of researching this camera and is thinking of buying (or has already bought) this camera will agree that the crux of the matter is this MOD/mpg/codec file business. I think if the people at JVC were to point their customers (or erstwhile customers as I think the majority of those reading this post must be) in the right direction concerning an acquisition source for the necessary codec(s) then they might have something of a sales deluge on there hands, this device and its predecesors the GZ-MC200/100 are already selling at a phenomenal rate in Japan, effectively out-stripping sales on established formats and brands in a way that some big electonics chain salespersons say they have not seen in the last 15 years. HD video and HDD storage are about to meet at the consumer level and the only thing we can do is brace for the impact.
Reply by member: robertlbyrd
Jul 1, 2005 I could not agree more. I was set to buy one until I learned of the .mod issue. Now I have decided to wait and see what the competition will come up with as I want a more felxible file format. This appears to be a great product, but it falls short of my needs.
Reply by member: dgreene
Jul 1, 2005 From what I have gathered, the mod file produced from the camera is not an obscure format. It is a standard mpeg-2 format with Dolby Digital (AC3) sound. The problem is many of the Video editors cannot read the AC3 sound format. It does appear that there might be many others that do, and maybe as more consumer grade digital camcorders support Dolby Digital the common Editing software tools will begin to support it.
Reply by member: hrslaw
Jul 8, 2005 Ditto to comment #15: I was already hesitant because I lean so far towards Sony, never having had a disaster with them; but this JVC seemed so good that I almost gave it a chance and I would have been seriously upset for having moved away from Sony. True, Sony might be later with the same/better model but this is not a $29.95 throw away camera. Hope JVC is reading these posts.
Reply by member: kranthipbl
Jul 9, 2005 hi anybody found a cover for lcd separately?
Reply by member: jakmal
Jul 27, 2005 Has anyone looked at the video editing software Movie Edit Pro v10 from Magix. I have this camera on order and expect it to arrive next week. A number of items they have support for is
Reply by member: Rank_Amecha
Jul 27, 2005 Adobe Premiere pro version 1.5 handles the output from this camera excellently All you need is to change the *.MOD to *.mpg however the price tag on Premiere pro 1.5 is quite hefty at circa 700U$.
Reply by member: Rank_Amecha
Jul 27, 2005 Need to emphasize that it's Version 1.5 of premiere pro that does the trick, version 1.0 has a sticky timeline playback issue (video playback isnt smoothly displayed in premiere's monitor window when an attempt to playback the movie direct from the timeline is made)I was unable to resolve this until upgrading to 1.5. other than the timeline scrubbing issue version 1.0 seemed fine, and played the file in the non-timeline monitor window (ie. directly from file).
Reply by member: dougnukem
Aug 23, 2005 I own this camera, and I do not want to use the included editing software. I'm using Avid Xpress, has anyone been able to edit the files in it.
Reply by member: chgorob1
Oct 31, 2005 JVC has posted an update for 16:9 problems with the cyberlink software
Reply by member: pzacle
Nov 18, 2005 What an illuminating discussion. It seems prudent to wait until the competition catches up and then choose the best all around package, which should always include ongoing support of the product by the manufacturer.
By member:
xpeter
- Sep 7, 2005
Editing .MOD video files with other softwareStrengths: compact, no tape Weakness: price, no viewfinder Editing Video files with the .MOD extension is an issue because of the Dolby Audio file. I found that "Media Studio 9" from ULEAD can edit thouse files after changing the .MOD to .MPG extension names. It also is compatible with the 16:9 Wide Video Mode for editing. 57% of readers found this review helpful. Did you find it helpful or unhelpful? Top
By anonymous - Jan 8, 2008
I wish i never bought this cameraStrengths: that you can use memory card instead of tapes, small size. Weakness: terrible at taking pictures, awful, awful. outside better than inside. We bought this before a vacation trip. all the pictures are awful, we didnt even download anything. we dont even use it anymore. we take small videos of the kids in the pool but its such a complicated camera that we use our cheaper $80 travel camcorder instead. Did you find it helpful or unhelpful? Top
By member:
eiwdigital
- Jul 17, 2006
A very solid update to the mc200Strengths: Small footprint, no tapes, decent still capabilities. 16:9 apect ratio recording. Weakness: You will need a spare battery and another 2-4GB SD/CF card. This camera is a great go everywhere digital dream. Its not High Def but it delivers the goods that nothing in its class can. The video provides bright and full colors using the 3ccd's it relies on. The 16:9 mode, something that was absent on the mc200 is a welcome addition. The build quality of this camera is great. Stills were pretty good considering its a secondary function. Video capture is a thing of the past when using this camera which is why I love it on a conceptual level. Now if the could make this High Def capable, this would hands down be one of the best camcorders on the market. You will need a bit of computer literacy with regard to video conversion and burning to live with this gadget but don't let that intimidate you. This is a great product but JVC's customer service is terrible. Just a warning. Don't plan on them helping you with this product. Also I reccomend a solid state SD/CF card in place of the included Microdrive. Solid state offer better battery performance as well as better stability. Solid state will last longer and can withstand shock (to a degree). this camera is definitely worth it if you can find it for the right price. Did you find it helpful or unhelpful? Top
reviewgist.com - Jan 5, 2010
Best Jvc Camcorder For Low Light
Video is Good according to 6 Camcorder experts. -- "excellent color quality"-camcorderinfo.com -- "The colors and sharpness are amazing"-easycamcorders.com -- "good manual control"-camcorderinfo.com Read more to find expert opinions on more features like Optics, Battery, Interface, etc. Top
testseek.com - Feb 9, 2009
JVC Everio GZ-MC500
Testseek.com has collected 17 expert reviews for JVC Everio GZ-MC500 and the average expert rating is 81 of 100. The average score reflects the expert community’s view on this product. Click below and use Testseek.com to see all ratings, product awards and conclusions. Top
TopTenREVIEWS.com - Jul 16, 2008
Jvc Gz-mc500
Jvc Gz-mc500 receives an overall TopTenREVIEWS score of 3.42 out of 4.00. It is ranked the #10 Flash camcorder of all time. The overall rating represents an intelligent balance of features, value as a function of price to features, and a summary of reviews from a variety of sources. The TopTen REVIEWS' formula gives a picture of important consumer features, market value, and a product's... Top
easycamcorders.com - Oct 3, 2005
Quick Review Camcorders: JVC GZ-MC500
The JVC GZ-MC500 stands at the forefront of a new generation of camcorders. Say good-bye to tapes – the flash memory camcorders have arrived in force. Well, almost. The new Everio digital media series from JVC offers a number of benefits over MiniDV, but the price, and several other factors, remains a significant hindrance. At $1500, the GZ-MC500 is by far the priciest Everio model, making it... Top
CamcorderInfo - Sep 2, 2005
JVC GZ-MC500 Camcorder Review
The GZ-MC500 is a unique camcorder. That is for sure. It combines a hefty price tag with non-tape media and jaw-dropping still performance to make JVC’s line of new pocket, hybrid camcorders something to be noticed. Unfortunately, the camcorder’s low light performance might not be up to par with some of the other contenders in its price range. Be that as it may, for the user only looking for... Top
|
Everio GZ
Strengths: High quality Mpeg2, compact, light, feature laden camera
Weakness: Apalling focus, low battery life, snail like start up, badly designed
I bought this camera solely on its high specifications and the novelty of using files instead of tapes. I was on a three month trek round Asia and the thought of a dual purpose camcorder and still camera was very attractive. I also always take my PowerBook with me for work and the combination was ideal.
In offering mpeg2, 3CCD, 5 megapixels stills and other advanced features this camcorder would attract the high end amateur and even pro user, but in practice this is just a low end, over priced consumer product in terms of final quality. Why? Well I'll get tot he gripes later. First the positive side.
The camera is about the size of a fist, a good compact size, relatively easy to handle thogh not pocket sized. The JVC designers have used nearly every part of the camera's external surface to place controls, button , plugs and slots, The camera pivots vertically only at 90 degrees but it would have better for the tiny LCD screen to move rather than the body.The hard plastic though was just weird, a portent of the design deficiencies of JVC engineers. I have no qualms with the quality of the movie files - high res, natural colour, ok exposure. I soon got used to downloading my files each night to my Mac in my hotel room and making a rough edit with Final Cut Pro. This was a doddle with an amazing free app called MPEG Streamclip. It is interesting how small mpeg2 files are compared to DV but it still took an age to transfer them to my Mac due to the slower USB2 interface. Why didn't JVC plump for fast Firewire, (a standard with most camcorders a fraction of the price is beyond me. I liked the inclusion of an audio recording only mode through the small microphone on the top.
So here's where the product lets itself down. My experience of using it in the field was one of desperation, aggravation and often disgust. I don't know where to begin.The more one uses it, the more one is convinced that the still camera was obviously tagged on as an afterthought and totally lets the camera down. Firstly the 5 mega pixel tag is a virtually criminal claim. My 2mb Fuji took far sharper pictures than this. Also because the sluggish autofocus rarely pinpointed anything, I found just a handful of the hundreds of still pictures I took to actually be in focus. The manual focus never indicated the optimum focus and one had to rely of the tiny inadequate and low resolution LCD to focus. There is no viewfinder in this camera and in most daylight operations the LCD was difficult to see. The time it took for the autofocus to find the subject and make an attempt was around seven seconds.. a disaster for that once in a lifetime action shot. Time and time again I would miss such shots sometimes due to the autofocus but mainly to the startup time of the camera itself. It took eight seconds each time the camera was turned on. Why I had to watch a JVC logo swirl around the screen when i could have been taking pictures was beyond me.
All the controls were well designed and close to hand except the on/off button which was a three way slider - off - record -playback. In practice these were too small and meant constantly sliding to the incorrect mode. It was infuriating, especially when the fingers were slightly damp or greasy. Perhaps the off button should have been in the middle, so that you only had to slide left or right. Otherwise all the other controls were great. A small joystick and onscreen menus were excellent but the main recording/shutter button needed a firm press giving the camera a small jolt and hence more blurred pictures. The still camera performed very badly in low light and the pathetically small pop up flash threw light not much further than about two metres. The auto exposure failed to compensate adequately for near subjects with the flash and most shots were bleached out. There was no hot shoe, so a third party flash was out of the question.
Battery life was disastrous. While everyone else on my holiday were still snapping away with their cheap digital cameras, mine had long exhausted it's power. The microdrive capacity was good and I never filled the disk. Although I bought two 1mb SD disks for the stills they also never filled up. The tiny stereo mics on the top were also adequate but sometimes my fingers strayed to this area and slightly covered them by mistake resulting in weird alien noises on playback. If a consumer is attracted by the high quality of the movie files,, then surely he would similarly require some decent sound. There is no provision for any external micro phone. This is really unbelievable.
There were many good features in the menu - manual exposure, disk management and others but would I recommend this camera? Not to whom the product is aimed. This is very much for the middle end consumer, not for any serious photography and its shortcomings put it into a £500 price bracket, not £800. With little competition I shall continue to use it as holiday camcorder.
87% of readers found this review helpful. Did you find it helpful or unhelpful?
Feb 27, 2006
Absolutely agree with stevkyt. The still quality is there only if used in manual mode, which takes time and is very hit and miss using the LCD screen, remember this is the only reference! Low light performance is poor i.e. indoors!