Reviews for JVC Everio GZ-MC500 Digital Camcorder - 1.8" LCD - CCD

10x Optical Zoom - 200x Digital Zoom - 4 GB Microdrive Included - MPN: GZMC500

  • 2
  By member: stevkyt - Feb 11, 2006

Everio GZ

Strengths: High quality Mpeg2, compact, light, feature laden camera

Weakness: Apalling focus, low battery life, snail like start up, badly designed

I bought this camera solely on its high specifications and the novelty of using files instead of tapes. I was on a three month trek round Asia and the thought of a dual purpose camcorder and still camera was very attractive. I also always take my PowerBook with me for work and the combination was ideal.

In offering mpeg2, 3CCD, 5 megapixels stills and other advanced features this camcorder would attract the high end amateur and even pro user, but in practice this is just a low end, over priced consumer product in terms of final quality. Why? Well I'll get tot he gripes later. First the positive side.

The camera is about the size of a fist, a good compact size, relatively easy to handle thogh not pocket sized. The JVC designers have used nearly every part of the camera's external surface to place controls, button , plugs and slots, The camera pivots vertically only at 90 degrees but it would have better for the tiny LCD screen to move rather than the body.The hard plastic though was just weird, a portent of the design deficiencies of JVC engineers. I have no qualms with the quality of the movie files - high res, natural colour, ok exposure. I soon got used to downloading my files each night to my Mac in my hotel room and making a rough edit with Final Cut Pro. This was a doddle with an amazing free app called MPEG Streamclip. It is interesting how small mpeg2 files are compared to DV but it still took an age to transfer them to my Mac due to the slower USB2 interface. Why didn't JVC plump for fast Firewire, (a standard with most camcorders a fraction of the price is beyond me. I liked the inclusion of an audio recording only mode through the small microphone on the top.

So here's where the product lets itself down. My experience of using it in the field was one of desperation, aggravation and often disgust. I don't know where to begin.The more one uses it, the more one is convinced that the still camera was obviously tagged on as an afterthought and totally lets the camera down. Firstly the 5 mega pixel tag is a virtually criminal claim. My 2mb Fuji took far sharper pictures than this. Also because the sluggish autofocus rarely pinpointed anything, I found just a handful of the hundreds of still pictures I took to actually be in focus. The manual focus never indicated the optimum focus and one had to rely of the tiny inadequate and low resolution LCD to focus. There is no viewfinder in this camera and in most daylight operations the LCD was difficult to see. The time it took for the autofocus to find the subject and make an attempt was around seven seconds.. a disaster for that once in a lifetime action shot. Time and time again I would miss such shots sometimes due to the autofocus but mainly to the startup time of the camera itself. It took eight seconds each time the camera was turned on. Why I had to watch a JVC logo swirl around the screen when i could have been taking pictures was beyond me.

All the controls were well designed and close to hand except the on/off button which was a three way slider - off - record -playback. In practice these were too small and meant constantly sliding to the incorrect mode. It was infuriating, especially when the fingers were slightly damp or greasy. Perhaps the off button should have been in the middle, so that you only had to slide left or right. Otherwise all the other controls were great. A small joystick and onscreen menus were excellent but the main recording/shutter button needed a firm press giving the camera a small jolt and hence more blurred pictures. The still camera performed very badly in low light and the pathetically small pop up flash threw light not much further than about two metres. The auto exposure failed to compensate adequately for near subjects with the flash and most shots were bleached out. There was no hot shoe, so a third party flash was out of the question.

Battery life was disastrous. While everyone else on my holiday were still snapping away with their cheap digital cameras, mine had long exhausted it's power. The microdrive capacity was good and I never filled the disk. Although I bought two 1mb SD disks for the stills they also never filled up. The tiny stereo mics on the top were also adequate but sometimes my fingers strayed to this area and slightly covered them by mistake resulting in weird alien noises on playback. If a consumer is attracted by the high quality of the movie files,, then surely he would similarly require some decent sound. There is no provision for any external micro phone. This is really unbelievable.
There were many good features in the menu - manual exposure, disk management and others but would I recommend this camera? Not to whom the product is aimed. This is very much for the middle end consumer, not for any serious photography and its shortcomings put it into a £500 price bracket, not £800. With little competition I shall continue to use it as holiday camcorder.

87% of readers found this review helpful. Did you find it helpful or unhelpful?

Top
Reply by member: numenoid
Feb 27, 2006

Absolutely agree with stevkyt. The still quality is there only if used in manual mode, which takes time and is very hit and miss using the LCD screen, remember this is the only reference! Low light performance is poor i.e. indoors!

  • 4
  By member: sooryanp - May 23, 2005

JVC Everio GZ-MC500 Digital Camcorder - 1.8" LCD -...

Strengths: Quality of Picture Small Size Navigation

Weakness: No Remote No Cover for LCD

Hi
i just received my camcoder from BestCameras UK.
I'm trying my hand on this, but initial reaction is very good.
i have compared the quality of the pictures with that of PVGS70 (us model)and GZMC500 Pictures are far better. But I'M feeling lack of Remote. Looks Flash is really good.

Wait, I will be posting my Complete Opinion in next 2 days.

But Over all , Good

67% of readers found this review helpful. Did you find it helpful or unhelpful?

Top
Reply by member: cuttyshark
Jun 14, 2005

I bought this camera last month. The picture quality is very BAD! 5 Mpixels? Where?? My SONY dsc-s85, 4.1 MP has much better photo quality than this supposed JVC 5 MP. The video quality is good.

Reply by member: piygu6rdtrs
Jun 14, 2005

Where is the other review of this camera??!!
this was getting to be very informative on this product.
N.

Reply by member: dgreene
Jun 27, 2005

Has anybody found a way to create a widescreen DVD with this camera? I found that the camera will generate a move with a 16:9 aspect ratio, but that the included Cyberlink PowerDirector software reduces the video to 4:3. I cannot find anywhere that the Cyberlink editing software supports 16:9. I also tried Pinnacle Studio 9, and Sony Vegas Studio. Neither of these packages can correctly open the video files. The Sony software will open the mpeg, but won't provide any sound. I called JVC, and was told that I need to call Cyberlink regarding the lack of 16:9 support. When I questioned them about problems opening the files from this camera with other editing packages, I was told that they only support the Cyberlink software included with the camera.

Reply by member: kranthipbl
Jun 29, 2005

hi have u tried playing in tv after making movie ?
i thought its not showing widescreen in computer and it will how in tv. plz check in tv.plz tell me how the quqlity also thanks

Reply by member: dgreene
Jun 29, 2005

I can only play the movie with a widescreen aspect ratio using the PowerDVD application. If I connect the camera directly to the tv, the image is played in 4:3, and everything is distorted (skinny). Also, the Cyberlink software used to create a dvd squishes the video into a 4:3 format and again everthing is distorted. This is true even if I try to play the finished DVD using the PowerDVD application.

Reply by member: kranthipbl
Jun 29, 2005

which format u r making movie?
is it giving same pixel as u r original pixel one after making movie.
have tried originl one playing in tv, and computer.(without making any chages and just changing extention mod to mpg).for me in computer without making any changes giving good quality.

Reply by member: dgreene
Jun 29, 2005

If I copy the .mod file, rename it to .mpg and play it using PowerDVD, the movie will play in a 16:9 format. If I try to open the file in Windows media player the image is 4:3. The pixel counts for the video do not change when I open it in PowerDirector, although I notice that the file size property of the input file in PowerDirector is slightly smaller than the actual file size in windows explorer.

I open the .mod file in PowerDirector, add it to the storyboard making no changes. I then attempt to create a high Quality DVD leaving it in the default NTSC format. The resulting DVD when opened in PowerDVD shows all the same properties except the aspect ratio has been changed from 16:9 to 4:3.

I have also tried each of using each of of the other PowerDVD output types and formats. I get slightly different results with each, but the aspect ratio of 4:3 is consistent.

Reply by member: robertlbyrd
Jun 29, 2005

So am I to unbderstand that this camera uses a proprietary file format that cannot be manipulated with any software but the included application? I was hoping I could just drag the files off of it like an external hard drive and edit them with my standard video editing software of which I use a few different packages.

Reply by member: dgreene
Jun 29, 2005

I don't know if the files from this camera are proprietary or not, but so far they are not properly read into Pinnacle Studio 9, or the Sony Vegas with DVD suite. When I called JVC regarding this problem, I was told that I needed the proper codec for the packages to work. When I asked how to get the proper codec, I was told by the JVC support person that she did't know how.

Reply by member: robertlbyrd
Jun 29, 2005

I just found this info from a review which supports the previous comment, but offers no real solutions:

To gain PC access to the Microdrive and contents of the SD card slot, the JVC is hooked up by USB 2 - no FireWire connection is provided. As with the previous Everios, video is recorded in the unusual MOD file format, which is MPEG2 video allied with Dolby Digital audio. Only the supplied CyberLink PowerProducer can edit MODs natively. However, we found we could simply rename them MPG files and edit them in any MPEG-aware editing app, although this relies on having the appropriate video and audio codecs installed.

Reply by member: dgreene
Jun 29, 2005

Where can I go to find the proper codecs? I tried re-naming files and opening them, but only the Sony software would play the file. The Sony software also wouldn't recognize the sound. Is there any software packages you could recommend? I like this camera, and would like to use it. Also, unlike the previous Everio models the GZ-500 supposedly records in a true 16:9 format. Is there any recommendations you can make for software that will recognize and burn this widescreen format?

I've got one more week to figure this out. :>

Thanks

Reply by member: robertlbyrd
Jun 29, 2005

Not sure, I guess i will buy one and try it out.

Reply by member: Rank_Amecha
Jul 1, 2005

I think anybody that has gone to the trouble of researching this camera and is thinking of buying (or has already bought) this camera will agree that the crux of the matter is this MOD/mpg/codec file business. I think if the people at JVC were to point their customers (or erstwhile customers as I think the majority of those reading this post must be) in the right direction concerning an acquisition source for the necessary codec(s) then they might have something of a sales deluge on there hands, this device and its predecesors the GZ-MC200/100 are already selling at a phenomenal rate in Japan, effectively out-stripping sales on established formats and brands in a way that some big electonics chain salespersons say they have not seen in the last 15 years. HD video and HDD storage are about to meet at the consumer level and the only thing we can do is brace for the impact.
For JVC this is a magic time they have arrived at the plateau where what is sure to be this decades longest and bloodiest videocam conflict is to be waged and found, much to there apparent surprise and everyone else’s dismay that they are all alone!, not a soul in sight, for the moment, but if they stop wringing there hands and shuffling their corporate feet for just a moment and listen carefully they will hear the crazed, slavering, howls and snarls of the rest of vid/cam pack as they scabber up to enjoin them.
So Japan Victor Company JVC has two choices, One; find someplace to hide and pray that Sony and Hitachi cant find you when the get there and begin to rip each other to shreds, or Two, they can press the high-ground advantage the y currently for all its worth, and establishing their position. Now interestingly doing that may hinge on something as simple as solving this MOD/mpeg issue. Hey, it would serve JVC well to bear theZ old moral in mind “For want of a nail… …the kingdom was lost” (Google that).
The purchase of the relevant codec (or of rights to use and distribution of said codec) from Cyberlink or whoever currently holds rights at present.(if that is indeed the complication here) would be a step in the right direction, costs incurrred would soon be recouped in present market.

Ironically only negative reviews I have read on this camera are to do with the MOD file and its picture quality. Now on the issue of picture quality I will say that anyone that has previously bought a camera that offers both video and picture functions will tell you that the complaints seen here are par for the course, these device will typically do only one thing well or both things mediocrely so I think the fact that eh video is good is a plus. On the other hand the MOD file issue (which I consider directly linked to the 16:9/4:3 aspect ratio issues raised above) could be the fly in JVCs “Everio ointment”.
The codec (and since the Cyberlink software has it incorporated it in some form) must exist If said codec were to allows JVCs customers the option of recourse to a wider set of editing applications this would only broaden the user base and improve JVCs bottom line.
Its such a painful shame to watch here (yet again) JVC so far ahead of the pack with this device, even Sony has yet to voice an adequate response. Yet it seem that they are on the verge of fumbling the ball over what, in a few years/months time, will come to light as a case of the corporate bean-counters, overruling the engineering and marketing divisions, who surely want to put out a device that they know would blow the competition AWAY. Currently every potential buyer from the weight-wise holiday planning consumer looking to make a smart buy to the tech-savvy pro-sumer are giving the Everios a look-see, they realize what 3CCD+HD+palmsize equals a shockingly large world of possibilities.
JVC should press this advantge with every Iota of there marketing muscle, every erg of there support strength, and make sure EVERIO is on “EVERIone's” lips, they just need to make sure that what is being said isn't "... Should I?" but "Hell yes!".

Reply by member: robertlbyrd
Jul 1, 2005

I could not agree more. I was set to buy one until I learned of the .mod issue. Now I have decided to wait and see what the competition will come up with as I want a more felxible file format. This appears to be a great product, but it falls short of my needs.

Reply by member: dgreene
Jul 1, 2005

From what I have gathered, the mod file produced from the camera is not an obscure format. It is a standard mpeg-2 format with Dolby Digital (AC3) sound. The problem is many of the Video editors cannot read the AC3 sound format. It does appear that there might be many others that do, and maybe as more consumer grade digital camcorders support Dolby Digital the common Editing software tools will begin to support it.

My big complaint is that JVC knowing this is not a widely supporte format, provided editing software with this camera that doesn't support all the camera features. For $1500 you should be given software that can at least use all the basic features of the camera. I find their support people to be evasive, and I will not by another JVC product.

Reply by member: hrslaw
Jul 8, 2005

Ditto to comment #15: I was already hesitant because I lean so far towards Sony, never having had a disaster with them; but this JVC seemed so good that I almost gave it a chance and I would have been seriously upset for having moved away from Sony. True, Sony might be later with the same/better model but this is not a $29.95 throw away camera. Hope JVC is reading these posts.

Reply by member: kranthipbl
Jul 9, 2005

hi anybody found a cover for lcd separately?

Reply by member: jakmal
Jul 27, 2005

Has anyone looked at the video editing software Movie Edit Pro v10 from Magix. I have this camera on order and expect it to arrive next week. A number of items they have support for is
Dolby® Digital multi-channel support

Also 16:9 support also. the software costs 59.xx
i think it may help with the audio and video issue.

Reply by member: Rank_Amecha
Jul 27, 2005

Adobe Premiere pro version 1.5 handles the output from this camera excellently All you need is to change the *.MOD to *.mpg however the price tag on Premiere pro 1.5 is quite hefty at circa 700U$.
(preservation of 16:9 aspect ratio still unchecked).

Reply by member: Rank_Amecha
Jul 27, 2005

Need to emphasize that it's Version 1.5 of premiere pro that does the trick, version 1.0 has a sticky timeline playback issue (video playback isnt smoothly displayed in premiere's monitor window when an attempt to playback the movie direct from the timeline is made)I was unable to resolve this until upgrading to 1.5. other than the timeline scrubbing issue version 1.0 seemed fine, and played the file in the non-timeline monitor window (ie. directly from file).

Rank Amecha
PC specs. P4 3.2 HT, 2GB RAM, Video card Matrox 64 MB AGP dual head,350GB HD. winXP pro.

Reply by member: dougnukem
Aug 23, 2005

I own this camera, and I do not want to use the included editing software. I'm using Avid Xpress, has anyone been able to edit the files in it.

When I rename it to .mpg Avid gives me an error saying "Sorry, Generic mpeg files are not supported".

Is there a way I can download some .mod codec, or some Dolby AC-3 Mpeg-2 codec.

This really sucks because we were planning on using this camera as independent film makers, and it would've been really cool, but now it seems like we'll have to convert all the files somehow which just sucks.

JVC really needs to support a better format, what were they thinking not making this format flexible enough or being able to import into other editing software suites.

We might try to use Adobe premiere 1.5, but we'd like to use Avid.

Reply by member: chgorob1
Oct 31, 2005

JVC has posted an update for 16:9 problems with the cyberlink software

http://www2.cli.co.jp/products/ne/update_eng.htm

Haven't tried it yet...hope it helps

Reply by member: pzacle
Nov 18, 2005

What an illuminating discussion. It seems prudent to wait until the competition catches up and then choose the best all around package, which should always include ongoing support of the product by the manufacturer.

  • 4
  By member: xpeter - Sep 7, 2005

Editing .MOD video files with other software

Strengths: compact, no tape

Weakness: price, no viewfinder

Editing Video files with the .MOD extension is an issue because of the Dolby Audio file. I found that "Media Studio 9" from ULEAD can edit thouse files after changing the .MOD to .MPG extension names. It also is compatible with the 16:9 Wide Video Mode for editing.
It also Make DVD's.
I use DVDit PE for authoring since also can handle Dolby files and the Wide 16:9 WIDE MODE.

57% of readers found this review helpful. Did you find it helpful or unhelpful?

Top
  • 2
  By anonymous - Jan 8, 2008

I wish i never bought this camera

Strengths: that you can use memory card instead of tapes, small size.

Weakness: terrible at taking pictures, awful, awful. outside better than inside.

We bought this before a vacation trip. all the pictures are awful, we didnt even download anything. we dont even use it anymore. we take small videos of the kids in the pool but its such a complicated camera that we use our cheaper $80 travel camcorder instead.

Did you find it helpful or unhelpful?

Top
  • 4
  By member: eiwdigital - Jul 17, 2006

A very solid update to the mc200

Strengths: Small footprint, no tapes, decent still capabilities. 16:9 apect ratio recording.

Weakness: You will need a spare battery and another 2-4GB SD/CF card.

This camera is a great go everywhere digital dream. Its not High Def but it delivers the goods that nothing in its class can. The video provides bright and full colors using the 3ccd's it relies on. The 16:9 mode, something that was absent on the mc200 is a welcome addition. The build quality of this camera is great. Stills were pretty good considering its a secondary function. Video capture is a thing of the past when using this camera which is why I love it on a conceptual level. Now if the could make this High Def capable, this would hands down be one of the best camcorders on the market. You will need a bit of computer literacy with regard to video conversion and burning to live with this gadget but don't let that intimidate you. This is a great product but JVC's customer service is terrible. Just a warning. Don't plan on them helping you with this product. Also I reccomend a solid state SD/CF card in place of the included Microdrive. Solid state offer better battery performance as well as better stability. Solid state will last longer and can withstand shock (to a degree). this camera is definitely worth it if you can find it for the right price.

Did you find it helpful or unhelpful?

Top
  • 3.0
  reviewgist.com - Jan 5, 2010

Best Jvc Camcorder For Low Light

Video is Good according to 6 Camcorder experts. -- "excellent color quality"-camcorderinfo.com -- "The colors and sharpness are amazing"-easycamcorders.com -- "good manual control"-camcorderinfo.com Read more to find expert opinions on more features like Optics, Battery, Interface, etc.

Read Full Review

Top
  • 4.0
  testseek.com - Feb 9, 2009

JVC Everio GZ-MC500

Testseek.com has collected 17 expert reviews for JVC Everio GZ-MC500 and the average expert rating is 81 of 100. The average score reflects the expert community’s view on this product. Click below and use Testseek.com to see all ratings, product awards and conclusions.

Read Full Review

Top
  • 4.3
  TopTenREVIEWS.com - Jul 16, 2008

Jvc Gz-mc500

Jvc Gz-mc500 receives an overall TopTenREVIEWS score of 3.42 out of 4.00. It is ranked the #10 Flash camcorder of all time. The overall rating represents an intelligent balance of features, value as a function of price to features, and a summary of reviews from a variety of sources. The TopTen REVIEWS' formula gives a picture of important consumer features, market value, and a product's...

Read Full Review

Top
  • 4.5
  easycamcorders.com - Oct 3, 2005

Quick Review Camcorders: JVC GZ-MC500

The JVC GZ-MC500 stands at the forefront of a new generation of camcorders. Say good-bye to tapes – the flash memory camcorders have arrived in force. Well, almost. The new Everio digital media series from JVC offers a number of benefits over MiniDV, but the price, and several other factors, remains a significant hindrance. At $1500, the GZ-MC500 is by far the priciest Everio model, making it...

Read Full Review

Top
  • 4.0
  CamcorderInfo - Sep 2, 2005

JVC GZ-MC500 Camcorder Review

The GZ-MC500 is a unique camcorder. That is for sure. It combines a hefty price tag with non-tape media and jaw-dropping still performance to make JVC’s line of new pocket, hybrid camcorders something to be noticed. Unfortunately, the camcorder’s low light performance might not be up to par with some of the other contenders in its price range. Be that as it may, for the user only looking for...

Read Full Review

Top