60% OFF Reviews for Warner Brothers Harry Potter & Chamber of SecretsFull Screen - MPN: 1000026105
$7.94 - $19.97
By member:
Spike65
- Jul 27, 2008
Warner Brothers Harry Potter & Chamber of SecretsIt's Harry Potter. Nuff said. Did you find it helpful or unhelpful? Top
By member:
Christie :P
- Jul 25, 2008
Warner Brothers Harry Potter & Chamber of SecretsHArry Potter!!!! Did you find it helpful or unhelpful? Top
By member:
Lena
- Jul 23, 2008
Warner Brothers Harry Potter & Chamber of SecretsI'm sort of bothered by these films. This review is about to go entirely off topic. You've been warned :P Why must everything for children become a movie, anyhow? Not that I've ever read these particular books, but seeing a director and/or cinematographer and/or casting director's interpretation of something that you've read as a child kinda destroys the "magic" a little, in my opinion. Imagination is important to foster, and books usually help. Did you find it helpful or unhelpful? Top
By member:
*~Jennifer~*
- Jul 22, 2008
Warner Brothers Harry Potter & Chamber of SecretsI love all the Harry Potter movies!!! This is my favorite kind of Fantasy movie! Did you find it helpful or unhelpful? Top
By member:
Haji849
- Jul 22, 2008
Warner Brothers Harry Potter & Chamber of SecretsThe Harry Potter books and movies are number one for me and there awesome! Did you find it helpful or unhelpful? Top
By member:
GenghisTheHun
- Jul 21, 2008
Warner Brothers Harry Potter & Chamber of SecretsSo far I have avoided the charm of Harry Potter. Did you find it helpful or unhelpful? Top
By member:
Kari Grace
- Jul 20, 2008
Warner Brothers Harry Potter & Chamber of SecretsIt is good, but the book is better. Did you find it helpful or unhelpful? Top
By member:
Kari Grace802
- Jul 20, 2008
Warner Brothers Harry Potter & Chamber of SecretsIt is good, but the book is better. Did you find it helpful or unhelpful? Top
By member:
Gloomyeeyore
- Aug 22, 2007
Warner Brothers Harry Potter & Chamber of SecretsA 3.5 this was an okay adaptation of the book. In this movie you see Tom Mavalro Riddle a.k.a. Lord Voldemort. I think that they portrayed Dobby well from the books. There were scenes from the book that they didn't put in the movie like Nearly headless Nicks deathday party. Did you find it helpful or unhelpful? Top
By member:
thomasnhill
- Jun 28, 2007
Harry potter rocksThis movie is perfectly cast as is all the Harry Potter movies.It was the best book in the series so far and the best movie so far.I love how Voldemort uses a ordinary boy and his diary for someone to become the heir of Salazar Slytherin.They look for a mysterious chamber that is somewhere in the castle.McGonagall and the others say that the castle has been searched many times but nothing was found.Harry,Ron,and Hermoine have to put the pieces together to finally discover where the chamber is. Did you find it helpful or unhelpful? Top
By member:
Jeremy00081
- Sep 13, 2006
Warner Brothers Harry Potter & Chamber of SecretsPretty good but far from thrilling. I'm one of those mean people who says Harry Potter films are for nerds. Sorry, but I think these movies are pretty geeky. Did you find it helpful or unhelpful? Top
By member:
Ih8rateitall
- Mar 18, 2006
Warner Brothers Harry Potter & Chamber of SecretsI just don't understand why this is so popular. Oh yeah, and the people in the movie theater, wedgie city dudes, wedgie city! Did you find it helpful or unhelpful? Top
By member:
Ih8rateitall.com
- Mar 18, 2006
Warner Brothers Harry Potter & Chamber of SecretsI just don't understand why this is so popular. Oh yeah, and the people in the movie theater, wedgie city dudes, wedgie city! Did you find it helpful or unhelpful? Top
By member:
CharmedOne1393
- Feb 25, 2006
Warner Brothers Harry Potter & Chamber of SecretsIt's Harry Potter...It's got to be good! Did you find it helpful or unhelpful? Top
By member:
AngelInDisguise99
- Feb 9, 2006
Warner Brothers Harry Potter & Chamber of SecretsI liked this movie. It was better than the first one, and the acting was even better. Did you find it helpful or unhelpful? Top
By member:
CherrySoda99
- Feb 9, 2006
Warner Brothers Harry Potter & Chamber of SecretsI liked this movie. It was better than the first one, and the acting was even better. Did you find it helpful or unhelpful? Top
By member:
rjy
- Nov 9, 2005
Warner Brothers Harry Potter & Chamber of SecretsThis is a great film! Did you find it helpful or unhelpful? Top
By member:
SilentBrook
- Sep 4, 2005
Warner Brothers Harry Potter & Chamber of SecretsThe best bit was Tom Marvolo Riddle. Did you find it helpful or unhelpful? Top
By member:
Maomania
- Feb 27, 2005
Warner Brothers Harry Potter & Chamber of SecretsBetter than the first movie. I can say as a non Harry Potter fan that I enjoyed watching it. It was a long movie, but it did not feel that bad compared to the first one. Did you find it helpful or unhelpful? Top
By member:
The Slacker
- Dec 23, 2004
Warner Brothers Harry Potter & Chamber of SecretsSome how they managed to make a more uninteresting movie than the first, amazing! How anyone could enjoy this bothers the hell out of me, nothing personal though, to each his own, but I really hate Harry Pothead because the movie felt like a bad acid trip. And to Piper Norman: Yes, yes he is. Did you find it helpful or unhelpful? Top
By member:
WarGamefan93
- Aug 16, 2004
Warner Brothers Harry Potter & Chamber of SecretsAll Harry Potter movies and books are O.K but they ain't great. Did you find it helpful or unhelpful? Top
By member:
tabaska907
- Jun 26, 2004
Warner Brothers Harry Potter & Chamber of Secretsit was good but it left to much stuff out from tha book Did you find it helpful or unhelpful? Top
By member:
suncat_nyc
- May 7, 2004
Warner Brothers Harry Potter & Chamber of SecretsRead the book first. Did you find it helpful or unhelpful? Top
By member:
deigratia22
- Feb 12, 2004
Warner Brothers Harry Potter & Chamber of SecretsI didn't like this film as much as the first. It got a bit boring and couldn't hold my attention like the first movie did. A well-made film though. Did you find it helpful or unhelpful? Top
By member:
tvtator
- Jan 9, 2004
Warner Brothers Harry Potter & Chamber of SecretsHarry is back, this time older. Still great, but have to take away a star because Dobby gets a little annoying. Did you find it helpful or unhelpful? Top
By member:
DarkNightChilde
- Nov 15, 2003
Warner Brothers Harry Potter & Chamber of SecretsThe books are much better. Daniel Radciffe is a little old to play Harry now. Did you find it helpful or unhelpful? Top
By member:
Ambience_McG
- Nov 10, 2003
Warner Brothers Harry Potter & Chamber of SecretsWhilst better than Philosopher's Stone, this film has too many downfalls to be classified as a 'great' or even 'good' film. Chris Columbus's direction is unsatisfying and the script takes away JK Rowlings smart dialouge and characterisation from the book and leaves us with shallow characters unable to be liked. Harry is an annoying hero, and Hermione is an up- herself know-it-all. The only characters who shine are Kenneth Brannagh's portrayal as Lockhart and Rupert Grint's Ron. As a big fan of the books, this film leaves a bitter taste in my mouth. Hopefully a change of director will give Prisoner of Azkaban the magical element of the books that have been lacking in the previous two films. Did you find it helpful or unhelpful? Top
By member:
betty boop
- Aug 3, 2003
Warner Brothers Harry Potter & Chamber of Secretsits Harry Potter so it has to get a least 4 stars. but this film was a little better than the first and some of the acting especially maggie smith was very good. also it had some good special effects. overall good but they could have done a better job with such a great storyline. Did you find it helpful or unhelpful? Top
By member:
kolby1973
- Jul 21, 2003
Warner Brothers Harry Potter & Chamber of SecretsThis movie is awesome. I think the movie was a star below the first one however, mostly because of that annoying house elf..ugh. But overall, this movie is entertaining from beginning to end, and I could watch it many more times without getting bored with it. Really cute. Can't wait until the next one. :) ~~~Kolby Did you find it helpful or unhelpful? Top
By member:
pikachan
- Jun 27, 2003
Warner Brothers Harry Potter & Chamber of SecretsPretty good sequel, but I liked the first a little better. Harry Potter is played by the same person from the first movie. This had some good effects, but it was a little too long. I missed it at theaters so I rented it. If you rent it, try not to fall asleep. Did you find it helpful or unhelpful? Top
By member:
PBeavr
- Jun 7, 2003
Warner Brothers Harry Potter & Chamber of SecretsA much more entertaining movie than the first and the time at the step parents house is made much more interesting with the intrduction of the house elf. He is annoying but it was better than having to listen to his "family" more. This movie was a much better overall effort than the first and does warrant a 5. The first had a childlike appeal to it which made it less entertaining for me than this one. Chamber is quite sophisticated and very well acted. The first movie focused more on Potters uncertainty in himself and it left him looking helpless most of the time. Looking back that was a fabulous set up for his desire and energy in this movie. In both he chose to solve a riddle but in the second he was a much more likeable and believable character. Understanding he is special and extremely gifted he moved with purpose instead of uncertainty. The movie avoids the lulls of the first and is a fine film. Did you find it helpful or unhelpful? Top
By member:
ecky85
- May 30, 2003
Warner Brothers Harry Potter & Chamber of SecretsAnother great Harry Potter movie. Did you find it helpful or unhelpful? Top
By member:
Sandy29CD
- May 26, 2003
Warner Brothers Harry Potter & Chamber of SecretsThis movie is one of the best movies that I have seen. I like this one better, because I think I've seen the first one a little too many times. I think the acting did get better. Did you find it helpful or unhelpful? Top
By member:
XShikaXShikaX
- Apr 26, 2003
Warner Brothers Harry Potter & Chamber of SecretsNo matter what others might say...this film is good. The story is excellent,(as many harry potter fans will tell you!) and the directing has made the magical side of it stand out in a fantasical quality. For all the fans out there i do agree that it is a great movie. The director has done a great job bringing the books to life so far and i think that this film was better than the last one. Having read the books there are a few differences in from the orginal story, but how can you expect a movie from such an imaginitive book to be exactly the same as the written version? This film following from the perviuos is one of those rareties...a sequel that is actualy as good (and better) than the first one...i look forward to the next movie and advise everyone to try and see this film.It was one of the must sees for the past year and now that its on DVD its even better! Did you find it helpful or unhelpful? Top
By member:
lindamichelle1
- Apr 23, 2003
Warner Brothers Harry Potter & Chamber of Secretscrap Did you find it helpful or unhelpful? Top
By member:
piper norman
- Apr 17, 2003
Warner Brothers Harry Potter & Chamber of Secretsharry potter is not a nerd Did you find it helpful or unhelpful? Top
By member:
Mentok the Mindtaker
- Apr 1, 2003
Warner Brothers Harry Potter & Chamber of SecretsThe movie like the books was surprisingly good. Did you find it helpful or unhelpful? Top
By member:
tvmoviemusicfrek
- Mar 22, 2003
Warner Brothers Harry Potter & Chamber of SecretsHorrible, thats all i have to say. Did you find it helpful or unhelpful? Top
By member:
QueenElessar
- Mar 14, 2003
Warner Brothers Harry Potter & Chamber of SecretsEven better than the first film and I loved that one! The pace is faster and the story is a little darker. All the exposition from the first film is largely out of the way, so they can really concentrate on telling an exciting story. There are some really funny moments to the film...personally I think that Rupert Grint who plays Ron is brilliant! In the one scene where he and Harry follow a trail of spiders through the forbidden forest, he kept whimpering and tugging on Harry's arm, his voice cracking at really humourous moments. Kenneth Brannagh was also very funny as Professor Lockheart, the self obsessed, and icompetent new teacher at Hogwarts. The effects were also well developed...Quiddich looked even more exciting than the first film and the CGI character Dooby was a joy to watch Did you find it helpful or unhelpful? Top
By member:
corkey2003
- Mar 8, 2003
Warner Brothers Harry Potter & Chamber of SecretsI felt that is a great movie, it didn't fit everything from the book into the story line but it captured the important aspects. Did you find it helpful or unhelpful? Top
By member:
Donkey Kong Song
- Feb 21, 2003
Warner Brothers Harry Potter & Chamber of SecretsBest. Movie. Ever. This ran circles around the first. Before I saw it, my favorite movie was The Nightmare Before Christmas. I haven't read any of the books, though. The best part was with the snake and the bird. Did you find it helpful or unhelpful? Top
By member:
BIGBABY
- Feb 7, 2003
Warner Brothers Harry Potter & Chamber of SecretsI liked this movie. When I went in, I thought I was going to see a boring dull kids movie. I found out that this movie is good for people of all ages. Go see it. Did you find it helpful or unhelpful? Top
By member:
callmetootie
- Feb 4, 2003
Warner Brothers Harry Potter & Chamber of SecretsDespite good special effects, and a fine performance by Maggie Smith, the film contained far too many characters and subplots. It was 1 hour way too long, and the ending was totally forced and had little or no meaning to it other than to scare little children. Daniel Radcliffe shows no emotion to his character, and makes Harry Potter out to be a complete nerd. Did you find it helpful or unhelpful? Top
By member:
Lactamaeon
- Feb 2, 2003
Warner Brothers Harry Potter & Chamber of SecretsThe book actually was a lot better. In the movie the´ve let out too much. So I must say that the first film was better. But I don´t hope that movie three will be as bad as the second. I this one they could have put in more information out of the book. It really disappointed me in many ways. Yet again they could have put more effort into the quidditch games. I don´t like having to say, that it is quite a shame. Sorry bout that. Did you find it helpful or unhelpful? Top
By member:
Ringoluck
- Jan 29, 2003
Warner Brothers Harry Potter & Chamber of SecretsNot as good as the first but still good. A little too long Did you find it helpful or unhelpful? Top
By member:
JMax
- Jan 5, 2003
Warner Brothers Harry Potter & Chamber of SecretsNot bad for the sophmore outing. Did you find it helpful or unhelpful? Top
By member:
broughaj
- Jan 5, 2003
Warner Brothers Harry Potter & Chamber of SecretsI have to admit that when I saw the first Harry Potter I was not impressed. I had no intentions of seeing the second release, but was dragged to see it with a friend. To my surprise this time around the film was quite good. I found comedy in the character of Dobi, but am dissappointed to learn he won't be in any of the new Harry Potter movies. Did you find it helpful or unhelpful? Top
By member:
lula_arg
- Jan 2, 2003
Warner Brothers Harry Potter & Chamber of SecretsA good movie, but not as good as it was expected to be. The actors are not remarkable, and the story begins to loose entertainmet. I liked the book best than the movie. Did you find it helpful or unhelpful? Top
By member:
lukskywlkr.
- Dec 11, 2002
Warner Brothers Harry Potter & Chamber of SecretsA very good film, but not as good as the first Potter film. The acting and production values are all first-rate, and the plot was interesting, but the film should have been about 15 to 20 minutes shorter. Had I not read the book beforehand, it probably would have held my attention better. It was a little strange watching the film, knowing that Richard Harris had already passed away from cancer just a few weeks before. All in all, I would recommend this one, especially to Potter fans, but anyone with young kids may be in for a challenge, because they are bound to get restless before this one is over. Did you find it helpful or unhelpful? Top
By member:
rgroldan
- Dec 10, 2002
Warner Brothers Harry Potter & Chamber of Secretsmuch better than the first one but they need to work on the 3rd film fast !! the lead actors will be growing mustaches soon and could probably already audition for the prof. dumbledorf part. Did you find it helpful or unhelpful? Top
By member:
MeriadocRox
- Dec 1, 2002
Warner Brothers Harry Potter & Chamber of SecretsIt was great! But it was a little too long and when I saw it the 2nd time a week later, I thought "When is it going to end?" Rupert Grint was hilarious with his nervous high voices. Oh, and Tom Felton was absolutly HOT! Did you find it helpful or unhelpful? Top
Rotten Tomatoes - Nov 30, -0001
Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets
Darker and livelier than the first Harry Potter, but much of what's wrong with the first movie is also present here. TopSponsored Links
Compare PricesAdvertisement  
|
Warner Brothers Harry Potter & Chamber of Secrets
Possiblement la més fluixa de totes
Did you find it helpful or unhelpful?