Search in
AT&T E5865 Cordless Phone

AT&T E5865 Cordless Phone

(5.8GHz, Answering Machine, Caller ID, Speakerphone - MPN: E5865)
Description: The E5865 from AT&T is a 5.8 GHz cordless phone with an all-digital answering system, dual keypads, and caller ID/ call waiting compatibility. It utilizes the 5.8 GHz band, the answering machine provides up to 25 minutes of recording time.

User Reviews

3 Star Review(4 Reviews)

Sort Reviews by: Most Useful | Date | Rating
Date Reviewed:  08/16/2005
  • carousels
  • from MI
  • Member Since:
    Aug 2005

  • View Member's:
    Reviews
    Product Experience:
    2 Days
Strengths: Rechargeable batteries vs throw-aways, intercom/pager handy, attractive design
Weaknesses: Wall mounting plate should be sturdier. Feel that in time, from just normal use, it will break
Summary: After comparing several brands felt this was the best priced/suited for my needs. Considered the color graphics model but didn't feel it was worth the considerable price difference.

100% of People (2/2) found this review helpful. Was this review helpful or unhelpful for you?

  Report this as inappropriate.

 There are no comments for this review. Post a comment.

Date Reviewed:  08/05/2005
  • sphomer
  • from NY
  • Member Since:
    Jan 2003

  • View Member's:
    Reviews
    Product Experience:
    1 Days
Strengths: Ease of setup, many features and appearance.
Weaknesses: I'd like to see a more secure base slot for handset when wall-mounted.
Summary: This is the best cordless phone/answering machine we've owned, yet. It took me less than 5 minutes to completely set it up. Speakerphones in both the base and handset a big plus. A very nice looking unit. The only improvement I'd like to see is a more secure handset in base slot to minimize the handset being dropped.

100% of People (2/2) found this review helpful. Was this review helpful or unhelpful for you?

  Report this as inappropriate.

 There are no comments for this review. Post a comment.

Date Reviewed:  12/11/2005
  • epweinsteinmd
  • Member Since:
    Dec 2005

  • View Member's:
    Reviews
    Product Experience:
    2 Weeks
2 Star ReviewThere are better choices
Strengths: Backlit number pad, answering machine message retrival, back-up battery charger in base
Weaknesses: dialing from CID log, difficult menu navigation, answering machine set-up buttons
Summary: I am an obsessive shopper, I like to do the research and then try different alternatives. In order to replace our old Motorola system that is a few years old and not working as well as a primary system needs to work, I tried the Uniden TRU8885 as well as the AT&T E5826BC before comming back to Motorola. I won't bore you with the technical details, you can read them for yourself, I will, however, give a summary of overall pros and cons. The reception on the 5.8 gHz systems was noticeably less than the Motorola 2.4 gHz and we have never had any interference from our wireless router. The ATT was nicely designed, including a charger for backup batteries in the base. However, the icon menus were difficult to navigate and you had to select the Caller ID (CID) menu from either the handset or the base before you could see calls. Once you selected them, there was no way to have local calls listed without the area code, so you couldn't dial from the CID log as you could from the Uniden and the Motorola. The Uniden was set up better but because of the 5.8 gHz freq has less reception than the 2.4 gHz Motorola, I found the buttons a little small on the Uniden and ending calls was not always reliable as many times the phone rang after hanging up with the other party still connected. In addition, the Uniden answering machine picks up briefly every times the phone rings and is not answered even if the caller hangs up. I have found the Motorola's menu to be easy to navigate and very intuitive. ATT and Uniden make a big deal about ring-tones which I don't care about, and ATT sings the praises of their color display that allows you to assign an icon for people in your phonebook. again, I don't care, I think that the Motorola is much easier to use, the reception has always been good, and the product reliable. I would by the Moto in a heartbeat over the competition.

0% of People (0/1) found this review helpful. Was this review helpful or unhelpful for you?

  Report this as inappropriate.

 There are no comments for this review. Post a comment.

Date Reviewed:  06/30/2006
  • N/A
  • Member Since:
  • Product Experience:
    1 Days
1 Star ReviewIf I'd known about the incompatability with the wi ...
Strengths: NA
Weaknesses: We had lots of static on the incoming message, and found out this sytem won't work with our wireless internet service. Unfortunately too late to return -
Summary: If I'd known about the incompatability with the wireless network, and static we'd have I wouldn't have bought it. I'm sure all the good things people say about it are true, but I can't use the machine.

Was this review helpful or unhelpful for you?

  Report this as inappropriate.

 There are no comments for this review. Post a comment.