|
Strengths: Closest shave to date. No nicks. No razor burn.
Weaknesses: Replacement blades cost a premium. Handle doesn't clean as well as the Mach 3 Turbo.
Summary: I picked up this razor once my Tracer Fx razr was, essentially, discontinued. The difference between the Quattro and the Tracer wasn't even close. Shortly afterwards, I received a promo Mach 3 turbo razor. The difference between the two top of the line razors are that the Quattro's close shave leaves zero razor burn and the head stays closer to the skin better since it's forward pivot pressure seems a little greater. The Mach 3 Turbo rinsed more easily, and the handle seems to be more durable over time. I have noticed the Quattro handle getting dirtier over time than the Turbo after about 40 shaves from each.
Over time, I think the Turbo will fare better however, the Quattro gives the most comfortable and, seemingly, the closest shave. It never ceases to surprise me just how I get no razor burn whatsoever, even from a brand new blade. Both replacement prices are the same w/out sales near me which is to say they are both expensive.
 90% of People (9/10) found this review helpful. Was this review helpful or unhelpful for you?
 There are no comments for this review. Post a comment.
|
Report this as 
